Printable Page Headline News   Return to Menu - Page 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 13
 
 
Justices to Decide on Census Question  02/16 10:37

   The Supreme Court will decide whether the 2020 census can include a question 
about citizenship that could affect the allocation of seats in the House of 
Representatives and the distribution of billions of dollars in federal money.

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court will decide whether the 2020 census can 
include a question about citizenship that could affect the allocation of seats 
in the House of Representatives and the distribution of billions of dollars in 
federal money.

   The justices agreed Friday to a speedy review of a lower court ruling that 
has so far blocked the Trump administration from adding the citizenship 
question to the census for the first time since 1950.

   Both the administration and opponents of the question agreed the court 
should settle the matter quickly because census forms need to be printed soon.

   Arguments will take place in late April. A decision should come by late June.

   The case pits the administration against immigrant advocacy organizations 
and Democratic-led states, cities and counties that argue the citizenship 
question is intended to discourage the participation of minorities, primarily 
Hispanics, who tend to support Democrats from filling out census forms.

   The challengers say they would get less federal money and fewer seats in 
Congress if the census asks about citizenship because people with noncitizens 
in their households would be less likely to fill out their census forms.

   The Constitution requires a census count every 10 years. A question about 
citizenship had once been common, but it has not been asked of every household 
since 1950. At the moment, the question is part of a detailed annual sample of 
a small chunk of the population, the American Community Survey.

   The case stems from Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross' decision in 2018 to add 
a citizenship question to the next census, over the advice of career officials 
at the Census Bureau, which is part of the Commerce Department. At the time, 
Ross said he was responding to a Justice Department request to ask about 
citizenship in order to improve enforcement of the federal Voting Rights Act.

   U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in New York ruled in January that the 
question could not be included, saying that fewer people would respond to the 
census and that the process Ross used was faulty.

   Pressed for time, the administration bypassed the federal appeals court in 
New York and appealed directly to the justices. The challengers defended the 
lower court ruling, but acknowledged the need for a quick answer to the legal 
issue.

   It's rare for the high court to weigh in without the benefit of appellate 
rulings. Such interventions usually are reserved for national political crises, 
including the Pentagon Papers case.

   The administration has defended the addition of the citizenship question by 
arguing that courts have no business second-guessing the commerce secretary in 
performing a basic function of his job.

   But Furman largely agreed with the local and state governments and rights 
groups that sued over the issue. He pointed out that Ross had ignored his own 
experts' views that a census with a citizenship question would produce less 
accurate results and add to the costs.

   Documents and testimony produced as part of the trial in New York showed 
that Ross had begun pressing for a citizenship question soon after he became 
secretary in 2017, and that he had consulted Steve Bannon, who had been 
President Donald Trump's top political adviser, and then-Kansas Secretary of 
State Kris Kobach. Emails showed that Ross himself had invited the Justice 
Department request to add the citizenship question.

   The judge's ruling held that Ross' decision about what to ask on the census 
was "arbitrary and capricious" under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.

   There are at least four other ongoing lawsuits over the question, including 
a trial in San Francisco that was wrapping up Friday. The Supreme Court, 
though, is expected to settle the matter with the case it has agreed to hear.


(KA)

 
 
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN